FORE Magazine

Top Menu

  • About Me
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Main Menu

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
  • scga.org
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

FORE Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
  • scga.org
Public AffairsSpring 2016
Home›Public Affairs›The Wages Of Indifference: Game’s Failure to Honor Public Sector Hurts Growth Efforts

The Wages Of Indifference: Game’s Failure to Honor Public Sector Hurts Growth Efforts

By Craig Kessler
April 1, 2016
5583
0
Share:
california

The golf industry is not of the same mind on all issues, but if there is one issue about which there is near unanimity it is the industry’s alarm at the closure of so many of the 3-par, 9-hole and executive length public courses central to reigniting growth.

Losing courses that were built at the end of the great expansionary cycle and often premised on business models unsustainable in a down market or losing courses in communities passed by time – these are the things of overdue correction.  But losing facilities the game has traditionally used to introduce the game to kids, beginners, young adults and counterintuitive demographics – that is the stuff of disaster.  And a “disaster” arguably of the industry’s own making.

The game’s leadership organizations never appreciated or even so much as acknowledged the role governments played in adding golf to the list of open space/recreational activities worthy of public investment. It took as a given something that was anything but – the idea that dedicating 100 plus acres of publicly owned land to golf was on a par with the societal benefit of dedicating public land to open space, sports fields, youth sports, trail systems, swimming pools, public gardens and other universally accessible activities.

For the bulk of the game’s history, publicly owned parkland golf courses were subsidized by general fund expenditures. They were built entirely by public monies and for decades sustained more by continuing outlays of public monies than by user fees – fees not set by the market but rather by governments’ commitment to making golf available to Everyman, not just the most affluent among us.  Once identified as a public amenity to be financed in small part by user fees but in larger part by general tax revenues, municipal golf courses were transformed into cash cows.  Municipalities, some of which had continued to provide the service through public employees but many more of which had begun to provide the service through private management firms, began thinking of themselves less as providers of public services than members of a rentier class entitled to large returns on a nest egg for which they no longer expended much if any effort.  Once that happened, municipal golf courses were expected to continue delivering net revenues to their parkland systems, and once that the expectation was no longer being met, the same governments that in another generation understood their obligation as subsidizing golf in the public interest began to understand their obligation as converting them to uses more amenable to generalized access – e.g., soccer, baseball, skate parks, picnic areas, etc., —  otherwise known as those recreational activities that have always conflated their interest with the public interest and done so very loudly.

This death spiral is playing itself out throughout the nation and with it many of the programs designed to rekindle growth.  Laudable junior and developmental programs perfectly suited to those courses least capable of turning a profit are ill-suited to championship layouts compelled to drive revenue for enterprise funds or daily fee properties suffering through the industry’s malaise or private clubs never designed to serve public purposes in the first place.

The industry did this to itself, and it did it, because too many of its practitioners became fixated on market metrics at the expense of recognizing the role played by other factors, among them government largesse.  Now that the market is telling the industry that it needs to be downsized, particularly in the sector the business understands as the sine qua non of growth efforts, it has nowhere to turn.  And governments, which have been ignored by the game at best and denigrated at worst, are hardly inclined to come to the game’s aid now that the industry’s interests are better served by going back to municipal golf’s first principles. Municipalities are inclined to do precisely what most of them are now doing – suggest that the industry raise its own monies to subsidize growth vehicles.  That’s a proposition the industry simply cannot afford; it never could.

Is the industry up to the task suggested here – recalibrating the narrative so that it celebrates the connection between the game of golf and the public good in a way that acknowledges and appreciates the public sector’s contribution to it? Yes, but only if it recognizes the need.  And considering past performance, that’s very much an open question.

Previous Article

The Splash Seeker: Saving the World One ...

Next Article

Keeping your scoring record accurate

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Craig Kessler

Craig came to the SCGA via the merger with the Public Links Golf Association (PLGA), where he served as Executive Director for 11 years and pioneered the development of the nation’s most active and accomplished advocacy component. He has been tasked with doing the same for the SCGA as its first Director of Governmental Affairs, albeit on a much larger stage. In addition to his current and previous job responsibilities, Craig has served as a USGA Committeemen continuously for 15 years, Chair of the Los Angeles Golf Advisory Commission, Chair of the Los Angeles County Golf Advisory Committee, Member of the City of Los Angeles’ Griffith Park Master Plan Board, Member of the Ventura Golf Advisory Group, Member of the Los Angeles County Junior Golf Foundation Board of Directors and Chair of the Los Angeles Junior Chamber of Commerce First Tee of Los Angeles Advisory Committee. In 2008 Craig was inducted into the Long Beach Golf Hall of Fame.

Related articles More from author

  • scga
    Public Affairs

    Power to the Acronym

    January 1, 2014
    By Craig Kessler
  • water-crisis
    Public AffairsSummer 2016Sustainability

    Drought? Megadrought?: Where do we stand and what does it mean for Southern California’s golf courses?

    July 1, 2016
    By Craig Kessler
  • Public AffairsSummer 2019

    The Strange Case of Glyphosate (Roundup)

    July 25, 2019
    By Craig Kessler
  • Fall 2021Public AffairsSustainability

    Getting to the Root of the Problem: It’s the Land, Stupid!

    October 27, 2021
    By Craig Kessler
  • Public AffairsWinter 2017

    A Miserable Year for Politics, a Great Year for Golf

    February 15, 2017
    By Craig Kessler
  • water-and-golf
    Fall 2015Public Affairs

    Golf and Water: The industry is ready for what comes next

    October 1, 2015
    By Craig Kessler

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • FeaturedNewsSpring 2022

    Not Your Father’s Game: With Two Facilities Newly Open and Callaway at the Helm, the Topgolf Explosion Comes to the Southland

  • FeaturedSpring 2022Travel

    Scotland Must-Plays & Hidden Gems: 10 Terrific Tracks that Prove the Old Course Isn’t the Only Game Around

  • FeaturedKnow the RulesSpring 2022

    The Provisional Ball: What? How? When?

  • FeaturedProfilesSpring 2022

    Bootstrap Golf: The Long Expedition of David Lipsky

  • FeaturedSpring 2022Travel

    The Pubs of St Andrews

FOLLOW US

Facebook Fans
Twitter 0Followers
Instagram 0Followers
Youtube 0Subscriber
  • Recent

  • Popular

  • Comments

  • The Pubs of St Andrews

    By Mike James
    April 21, 2022
  • Scotland Must-Plays & Hidden Gems: 10 Terrific Tracks that Prove the Old Course Isn’t the ...

    By Joe Passov
    April 21, 2022
  • Bob Does Hollywood: The Hardest Working Man on Instagram Finds Gold in Golf

    By Adam Hawk
    April 21, 2022
  • Not Your Father’s Game: With Two Facilities Newly Open and Callaway at the Helm, the ...

    By Scott Kauffman
    April 21, 2022
  • The Provisional Ball: What? How? When?

    By Jimmy Becker
    April 21, 2022
  • The Diva Golfer

    By Azucena Maldonado
    January 31, 2017
  • The USGA’s Major Proposed Changes to the Rules of Golf

    By admin
    December 14, 2017
  • Stand By Me: Temecula Native Joe Skovron On Life As Rickie Fowler’s Caddie

    By Jonathan Coe
    October 26, 2016
  • Remembering Jim Murray: Best of the Best

    By Bill Dwyre
    February 14, 2017
  • Watching the Tiger Watchers

    By Andy Brumer
    February 20, 2018
  • free proxy list
    on
    December 5, 2018

    Top 4 College Golf Names You Need To Know

    Hello,I log on to ...
  • Adela C. Garcia
    on
    November 17, 2018

    Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”

    Azucena Maldonado is a ...
  • Rose Sauceda
    on
    November 15, 2018

    Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”

    Congratulations my lovely Amiga ...
  • Judy Carls
    on
    November 15, 2018

    The Gilded One: Eldorado CC

    Excellent magazine..thank you Judy Carls LPGA ...
  • SUE KNIGHT
    on
    October 19, 2018

    FULL HOUSE: First FORE Her Golf Outing

    I enjoyed the article ...

RECENT COMMENTS

  • free proxy list on Top 4 College Golf Names You Need To Know
  • Adela C. Garcia on Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”
  • Rose Sauceda on Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”
  • Judy Carls on The Gilded One: Eldorado CC
  • SUE KNIGHT on FULL HOUSE: First FORE Her Golf Outing
© 2016 FORE Magazine About Us | Contact Us | Advertise