FORE Magazine

Top Menu

  • About Me
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Main Menu

  • Current Issue
  • Digital Book
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

FORE Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Digital Book
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
EquipmentWinter 2017
Home›Equipment›Equipment: Now vs. Then

Equipment: Now vs. Then

By Scott Kramer
February 14, 2017
8250
0
Share:

Some popular equipment brands from the late 1960s, such as Ram, Shakespeare, MacGregor, Dunlop, Walter Hagen, PGA and Arnold Palmer, exist no longer. But others, including Wilson and Titleist, are time-tested and still thriving.

PING was really just getting started back then. In 1966, its now-renowned Anser putter was born. Whereas today’s club designs are often started with sophisticated CAD renderings by teams of former rocket scientists, the Anser was physically drawn via pencil on a record jacket by engineer and PING founder Karsten Solheim. PGA TOUR pros and scores of amateurs alike still use the 51-year-old style in one of its many versions that PING has debuted over the years or that competitors have copied.

But that kind of longevity is unheard of these days, where product lifecycles generally last somewhere between six months and one year. Back in 1967, products stuck around for a while. Especially because producing them by the masses wasn’t as easy as it is today. And clubs were generally sold in 11-club sets that consisted of a driver, 3-wood and 4-wood, plus 3-iron through pitching wedge.

DRIVERS

Fifty years ago, most drivers were made of persimmon wood, and laminated for durability. They were inconsistent from one head to the next: No two drivers even of the same model had identical wood grain, which altered both appearance and performance. Face inserts were generally screwed into place — thus the term “hitting it on the screws” was prevalent. And the shafts were mostly steel, made predominantly by True Temper in the United States, although Nippon was also making a name for itself in Japan. There were also some fiberglass and aluminum shafts, as well.

“Today’s drivers have about 300-330 grams total weight,” says Tom Olsavsky, vice president of research and development at Cobra Golf. “Back then, wooden, steel-shafted drivers weighed 370-390 grams. Try swinging one of those today! There was no spring-like effect from wooden heads that were about 130-150cc, of which the hosel was a huge part of. So the MOI was closer to 1,000 while today most drivers are nearly 5,000, obviously a huge improvement in forgiveness. Modern drivers are much more playable and easier to hit higher and straighter. Especially since those big wooden hosels needed face progression from the shaft axis to the leading edge, which also produced lower and more open faces at impact. So the modern driver is much easier to hit straight as well.”

Today’s drivers get up to 30 yards more peak distance and 40 yards improvement on mishits.

IRONS

Then there were irons — all muscle-backs. MacGregor, touting Jack Nicklaus as its poster boy, was one of the most popular names in irons with its VIP model. And PING was experimenting with cavity-backs, in the form of the Anser irons. The company’s popular K1 cavity-back emerged in 1969. Today, there are game-improvement and super-game-improvement irons with larger heads that are longer and much more forgiving. Interestingly though, experts say that today’s muscle-back forgings, other than potential distance gains from stronger lofts, bear minimal performance differences from 1967.

WEDGES

Among wedges, Wilson Staff’s Dyna-Power model led the way. By contrast, today’s models often offer various grinds, specific bounce angles, various finishes, and precision-milled grooves.

“First of all you wouldn’t have a wedge with higher loft than 56 degrees back then,” says Roger Cleveland, wedge and iron designer at Callaway Golf. “You would have ample bounce — 13 to 15 degrees — which was great for the softer sand used in those days and the correct amount of bounce for the higher green surrounds that existed then. Wedge selection was easier: you either used a 49-to-50-degree pitching wedge or a 56. Grooves were a little bigger and not looked at as an enhancement like today. Irons had a true V-groove but the wedges were typically much more aggressive.”

And forget about customized clubs. No one really thought about player-specific clubs until PING debuted color-coded irons in 1972, each bearing different lie angles.

BALLS

As for golf balls, 50 years ago Titleist ran an ad claiming it was tops on the PGA TOUR for 18 years running (some things don’t change, after all!) and that it paid no one to use its product. That year, Spalding purchased a patent for a very pricey-to-produce solid ball from Jim Bartsch who proposed a ball void of the layered approach seen in earlier designs. Spalding’s chemical engineering team developed a chemical resin that eliminated the need for the former layered components, thus creating the solid core ball.

Around that time, Ram launched the first ball featuring DuPont’s Surlyn ionomer resin cover that would eventually became a popular ball cover, displacing balata due to its durability and cut-resistance.

Of course, today’s models offer advanced constructions and materials. While older tour-type balls spun 4,000-5,000 rpm and were difficult to keep straight — particularly from those smaller driver clubheads — today’s premium models generally aim for long, low-spinning tee-shot distance with high greenside spin that helps shots stop on a dime.

Previous Article

The Full Circle of Golf: Peter Ueberroth’s ...

Next Article

Remembering Jim Murray: Best of the Best

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Scott Kramer

Veteran golf writer Scott Kramer has covered the golf equipment market full-time since 1990. His career has spanned senior editor positions at both Golf Pro Magazine and GOLF Magazine. He now works on a freelance basis for many consumer and trade publications, including the SCGA’s FORE magazine.

Related articles More from author

  • EquipmentSpring 2018

    Triple Threat: Three Ways to Improve at Omni La Costa Resort & Spa

    April 26, 2018
    By Tod Leonard
  • Equipment

    Bridgestone’s Riding On New Clubs

    August 9, 2018
    By Scott Kramer
  • Equipment

    Callaway Epic is… Epic!

    January 11, 2017
    By Scott Kramer
  • Putter Equipment
    EquipmentSpring 2016

    View from the Top: Putting when the Bars All Align

    April 1, 2016
    By Scott Kramer
  • Equipment

    Ecco’s Next Step

    October 18, 2017
    By Scott Kramer
  • ProfilesWinter 2017

    Remembering Jim Murray: Best of the Best

    February 14, 2017
    By Bill Dwyre

Recent Posts

  • At The TurnFeaturedSCGA JuniorSpring 2025

    Mr. & Mrs. Porter

  • Core MissionFeaturedKnow the RulesWinter 2024

    Match Play Madness

  • FeaturedIn The ClubhouseSummer 2025

    From Page to Screen

  • FeaturedSummer 2025

    SCARECROW

  • FeaturedIn The ClubhouseSummer 2025The Podium

    Twilight Golf

FeaturedSummer 2025

SCARECROW

Golfers can expect massive fairways, plenty of bailout areas, wild and creative contours and multiple routes to the greens.
  • LOFTY STAGE

    By Tod Leonard
    August 20, 2025
  • Players Welcome

    By Judd Spicer
    August 20, 2025
  • Beyond Sustainability

    By Robert Earle Howells
    August 20, 2025
  • CABO EVOLVES

    By Joe Passov
    August 20, 2025
© 2016 FORE Magazine About Us | Contact Us | Advertise