FORE Magazine

Top Menu

  • About Me
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Main Menu

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Travel
  • Equipment
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Governmental Affairs
  • scga.org
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

FORE Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Travel
  • Equipment
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Governmental Affairs
  • scga.org
Handicap Hints
Home›Handicap Hints›The Truth Behind those Tournament Scores

The Truth Behind those Tournament Scores

By Kevin O'Connor
January 1, 2014
3838
0
Share:

The concept of a tournament has differing connotations for different people. Some golfers get sweaty palms and jangled nerves, while others seem to rise to the top and excel.

The USGA Handicap System™ looks at scores identified with a T, for Tournament, to see if outstanding performance exists. As part of the calculation at each revision, Section 10-3, Reduction of Handicap Index Based on Exceptional Tournament Scores, is automatically checked for.

There is quite a bit of math involved, but SCGA members with at least two eligible tournament score Handicap Differentials (either made within the last 12 months or within the player’s current 20-score history) of at least 3.0 better than the normal Handicap Index® calculation via Section 10-2 are subject to the procedure and its computation.

Lots of functions are called tournaments, so the USGA provides recommendations on what to identify as a Tournament Score for handicap purposes. With it being early in the year, Handicap Committees and Tournament Committees at clubs should work together to determine which rounds will get the tournament score designation for 2014.

Important events are the focus. These groups will do their best to communicate to members/participants which scores will be identified as T-scores, often acknowledging this in Conditions of Competition or Notices to Competitors, or even a Rules sheet. Usually this information includes whether the committee is going to post the scores for the event on behalf of the contestants or whether the individual player will be required to post and designate the score as a tournament score on their own.

Any golfer who has been impacted by Section 10-3 will have an R designation next to their Handicap Index. This is part of the USGA’s formula, not some action taken by the SCGA or a member club. A golfer with the R designation is not locked at this number for any certain time period, as a number of variables contribute to the calculation, including number of tournament scores (two exceptional tournament scores out of three is more likely to cause a reduction than two out of 15), the age of the tournament scores and the normal Handicap Index calculation.

Sometimes golfers impacted express the concern that at the time the score was posted it did not seem exceptional, but as a player’s normal calculation increased a score/differential may have become exceptional. This was purposely implemented as part of the formula, which is all about potential ability.

This formula was put into place a number of years ago in response to a grass roots concern expressed by golfers, golf clubs and golf associations that tournament performance is important in trying to correctly determine the potential ability of a golfer. Its math is targeted to impact slightly less than one-half of one percent of golfers with a Handicap Index.

Club Handicap Committees are often approached by members impacted expressing concerns and sometimes bewilderment. While committees have powers, rarely are there good reasons to override a Section 10-3 reduction. Paraphrasing one USGA researcher who communicated very clearly — a player who plays like a five at least twice is reduced to a nine, but thinks he should be a 13.

So enjoy the competitive aspect of the game. Every golfer can expect to have one extremely successful round, but at the sign of a second such round, may see a change in the resulting Handicap Index.

Previous Article

Power to the Acronym

Next Article

Gears for Good

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Kevin O'Connor

Kevin joined the SCGA in August of 2012, and will oversee utilization of the USGA Handicap System by SCGA members and member clubs, including utilization of the GHIN service. Having worked at the Northern California Golf Association in a similar role, and then more recently in a senior management role with the United States Golf Association, his experience positions him to assist the SCGA and its members in continued successful implementation of these core programs.

Related articles More from author

  • Handicap HintsSpring 2019

    Your Potential Ability: Why You Don’t Always Play To Your Handicap

    April 26, 2019
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Handicap Hints

    The New Year is here – how did I do last year?

    January 1, 2015
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Handicap HintsWinter 2021

    WHS: A first-year review

    January 15, 2021
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Handicap HintsSummer 2016

    In Pursuit of Smiles: Measuring the progress of junior golfers

    July 1, 2016
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Handicap HintsSpring 2015

    The Alphabet Soup

    April 1, 2015
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Handicap Hints

    Under the Radar Services

    October 1, 2014
    By Kevin O'Connor

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • Fall 2020FeaturedTravel

    Glorious Isolation: Rams Hill

  • FeaturedThe PodiumWinter 2021

    Ely’s Gift to Golf

  • FeaturedWinter 2021

    Yoga & Golf – Flexibility, Balance & Strength

  • Fall 2020FeaturedProfiles

    Strong Game: Haley Moore

  • FeaturedTravelWinter 2021

    Western Waltz: 18 Fave Holes From the Rockies to the Pacific

FOLLOW US

Facebook Fans
Twitter 0Followers
Instagram 0Followers
Youtube 0Subscriber
  • Recent

  • Popular

  • Comments

  • Western Waltz: 18 Fave Holes From the Rockies to the Pacific

    By Joe Passov
    January 19, 2021
  • Eternal Sportsman: The Dual Passions of Bode Miller

    By Judd Spicer
    January 18, 2021
  • Enchanted Valley: San Gabriel CC

    By Joe Passov
    January 17, 2021
  • The Rising Star of Gabi Ruffels

    By Matt McKay
    January 16, 2021
  • A Look Back in Time: The LACC’s Hope-Ware Collection

    By Judd Spicer
    January 16, 2021
  • The Diva Golfer

    By Azucena Maldonado
    January 31, 2017
  • The USGA’s Major Proposed Changes to the Rules of Golf

    By admin
    December 14, 2017
  • Stand By Me: Temecula Native Joe Skovron On Life As Rickie Fowler’s Caddie

    By Jonathan Coe
    October 26, 2016
  • Remembering Jim Murray: Best of the Best

    By Bill Dwyre
    February 14, 2017
  • Watching the Tiger Watchers

    By Andy Brumer
    February 20, 2018
  • free proxy list
    on
    December 5, 2018

    Top 4 College Golf Names You Need To Know

    Hello,I log on to ...
  • Adela C. Garcia
    on
    November 17, 2018

    Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”

    Azucena Maldonado is a ...
  • Rose Sauceda
    on
    November 15, 2018

    Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”

    Congratulations my lovely Amiga ...
  • Judy Carls
    on
    November 15, 2018

    The Gilded One: Eldorado CC

    Excellent magazine..thank you Judy Carls LPGA ...
  • SUE KNIGHT
    on
    October 19, 2018

    FULL HOUSE: First FORE Her Golf Outing

    I enjoyed the article ...

RECENT COMMENTS

  • free proxy list on Top 4 College Golf Names You Need To Know
  • Adela C. Garcia on Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”
  • Rose Sauceda on Revolutionizing the “Ladies Club”
  • Judy Carls on The Gilded One: Eldorado CC
  • SUE KNIGHT on FULL HOUSE: First FORE Her Golf Outing
© 2016 FORE Magazine About Us | Contact Us | Advertise