FORE Magazine

Top Menu

  • About Me
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Main Menu

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Travel
  • Equipment
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Governmental Affairs
  • scga.org
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

FORE Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Travel
  • Equipment
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Governmental Affairs
  • scga.org
Fall 2020Handicap Hints
Home›Issues›Fall 2020›Handicap Hints: Exceptional Score Reductions

Handicap Hints: Exceptional Score Reductions

By Kevin O'Connor
October 14, 2020
1047
0
Share:

GLAD YOU HAD A GREAT ROUND, BUT …

Occasionally, everything comes together during a round of golf. Some may remember Bishop Pickering having “the best game of my life” during a serious thunderstorm in the film Caddyshack. I believe Mother Nature won that battle.

The World Handicap System has several checks and balances to make sure that the Handicap Index is representative of a player’s demonstrated ability. One of those measures is the Exceptional Score Reduction procedure, which is part of Rule 5.9 from the Rules of Handicapping.

When a score is submitted, the score differential (which considers the Course Rating, Slope Rating and Playing Conditions Calculation, not just the score itself) is checked to determine if it is significantly better than anticipated by the system. A score differential that is at least 7.0 better than the Handicap Index at the time the round is submitted is considered “exceptional” and results in an automatic reduction to the Handicap Index.

Part of the rationale for a reduction is research showing that someone doing this well is likely to do so again in the future, and this indicates the Handicap Index isn’t reflective of the player’s demonstrated ability. The reduction makes the Handicap Index more statistically accurate. (If you were wondering, there isn’t a Horrific Score Increase procedure for someone who plays very poorly.)

How does the procedure work? The score differential is compared against the Handicap Index to see if it is at least 7.0 lower. Let’s say a player with an 11.7 Handicap Index scored 76 on a tee with a Course Rating of 70.9 and a Slope Rating of 127. The resulting score differential is 4.5, which is 7.2 better than the Handicap Index. Because this meets the exceptional definition, this results in an adjustment to the Handicap.

Index of -1, in addition to the normal calculation of the Handicap Index. Note that not only is the normal calculation likely lowering the Handicap Index, but the Exceptional Score Reduction is as well. Both elements apply.

THE WORLD HANDICAP SYSTEM HAS SEVERAL CHECKS AND BALANCES TO MAKE SURE THAT THE HANDICAP INDEX IS REPRESENTATIVE OF A PLAYER’S DEMONSTRATED ABILITY. ONE OF THOSE MEASURES IS THROUGH THE EXCEPTIONAL SCORE REDUCTION PROCEDURE, WHICH IS PART OF RULE 5.9 FROM THE RULES OF HANDICAPPING.”

How is the -1 reduction applied?

Each of the 20 most recent score differentials are reduced by 1.0.

In our example, the player would have become a 10.8 if there was no reduction, but with the reduction becomes a 9.8.

This reduction does not lock the player at a specific Handicap Index for any length of time. Newly added scores/score differentials after the reduction has been implemented do not have the reduction applied and push out the oldest score differentials, which did have the reduction. Frequency of play works the reduced score differentials out of the scoring record over time.

There has been an exceptional score procedure in handicapping for nearly 30 years, but what existed previously was somewhat more complex. Changes in the World Handicap System result in the following when tied to an Exceptional Score Reduction:

❚ A single score/score differential can cause an Exceptional Score Reduction

❚ Any score can cause an Exceptional Score Reduction (competitive, away, nine-hole scores combined, casual, etc.)

❚ A reduction does not “freeze” the Handicap Index

❚ Scores posted after an Exceptional Score Reduction has been applied are not impacted

There are two additional items to point out: 

❚ Exceptional Score Reductions are cumulative, so if a player has another -1 reduction, previously impacted score differentials that are still part of the most recent 20 scores will have been reduced by a total of -2

❚ Besides the 7.0 threshold, there is a second threshold of 10.0. If a player submits a single score that produces a Score Differential of 10.0 strokes or more below their Handicap Index, that will result in a -2 reduction to the 20 most recent score differentials. If the example player referenced earlier was an 11.7 and had a .9 Score Differential, 10.8 better than the Handicap Index, a -2 reduction would apply (in addition to the normal 8 of 20 calculation).

Besides likely noticing the decrease in the Handicap Index, the scoring record will display the letter E for “exceptional,” in the Score column of the score that caused the reduction, and each impacted score differential will have a circle with an exclamation point inside it in the differential column/reference. If one clicks or taps on the circle with an exclamation point, it will explain that an Exceptional Score Reduction has been applied, including the amount.

The Exceptional Score Reduction is a check and balance that helps the credibility of the World Handicap System and the math procedures associated with it. This procedure protects all players in relation to one another and results in a better Handicap Index more indicative of a player’s demonstrated ability.

Enjoy that great round, but recognize that the Handicap Index will decrease more than the normal 8 of 20 calculation.

Previous Article

Equipment: Tomorrowland

Next Article

Travelin’ Joe: Desert Gems

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Kevin O'Connor

Kevin joined the SCGA in August of 2012, and will oversee utilization of the USGA Handicap System by SCGA members and member clubs, including utilization of the GHIN service. Having worked at the Northern California Golf Association in a similar role, and then more recently in a senior management role with the United States Golf Association, his experience positions him to assist the SCGA and its members in continued successful implementation of these core programs.

Related articles More from author

  • Fall 2020The Podium

    The Podium: Masters Memories

    October 27, 2020
    By Bill Dwyre
  • Handicap Hints

    Under the Radar Services

    October 1, 2014
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Fall 2020Golf Groups

    Club Spotlight: Making Cuts On & Off the Course

    October 13, 2020
    By Scott Fluhler
  • Fall 2020Trends

    The Green Golf Club: A Recipe for the Future

    October 9, 2020
    By Judd Spicer
  • Fall 2020Governmental Affairs

    A Change is Gonna Come

    October 9, 2020
    By Craig Kessler
  • Fall 2020FeaturedProfiles

    Strong Game: Haley Moore

    October 28, 2020
    By Robert Earle Howells

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • FeaturedProfilesWinter 2021

    Eternal Sportsman: The Dual Passions of Bode Miller

  • FeaturedThe PodiumWinter 2021

    Ely’s Gift to Golf

  • FeaturedWinter 2021

    Transformation – The Rising Star of Gabi Ruffels

  • FeaturedTravelWinter 2021

    Western Waltz: 18 Fave Holes From the Rockies to the Pacific

  • FeaturedKnow the RulesSpring 2019

    Rules Mailbag: Our Rules Czars Answer Your Questions

FeaturedWinter 2021

Transformation – The Rising Star of Gabi Ruffels

Should you ever approach the first tee and find Gabriela Ruffels there, don’t hesitate to say hello. There’s a strong chance she’ll be receptive – the social aspect of golf is ...
  • A Look Back in Time

    By Judd Spicer
    January 22, 2021
  • Enchanted Valley

    By Joe Passov
    January 22, 2021
  • Kids & Golf

    By Tina Mickelson
    January 22, 2021
  • Against All Odds

    By Gary Van Sickle
    January 22, 2021
© 2016 FORE Magazine About Us | Contact Us | Advertise