FORE Magazine

Top Menu

  • About Me
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Main Menu

  • Current Issue
  • Digital Book
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

FORE Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Digital Book
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
Core MissionFall 2024Handicap HintsIn The Clubhouse
Home›Core Mission›Great Expectations

Great Expectations

By Kevin O'Connor
October 16, 2024
5805
0
Share:

What Are You Expecting?

As of 2024, the expected score procedure is used to calculate an 18-hole Score Differential™ for any eligible nine-hole or 10- to 17-hole round. An expected score can be thought of as a neutral value, meaning that a good nine-hole round played will result in a good 18-hole Score Differential. An average nine-hole round will result in an average 18-hole Score Differential, etc.

While the formula for expected score is proprietary to the World Handicap System™, using the neutral guideline above, analysis shows that an expected score is close to an “average” nine-hole Score Differential for a player with a certain Handicap Index®. It’s normal to score between 2.0 and 5.0 strokes above handicap for 18 holes depending on Handicap Index, so average would be close to one-half of that range for nine holes.

A calculated Score Differential for the nine holes played is combined with the expected score value for a player with a given Handicap Index to produce an 18-hole Score Differential. This same philosophy applies for any round where nine to 17 holes have been completed — neutral data for holes not played. The expected score formula is not related to a specific course and does not consider how the player did on the holes played. It is simply associated with the player’s Handicap Index.

The intent is not to give an advantage or to punish someone who posts a nine-hole score (or any score of less than 18 holes) but to add a value that is normal for a player based on their Handicap Index.

A small number of players who have a good nine-hole score (relative to their Handicap Index) have expressed concern that the 18-hole Score Differential is higher than if the score from the nine holes played were doubled. While playing to handicap is an appropriate goal, given that a player is only supposed to do that some 20 percent of the time, the previously referenced neutral concept is going to provide more realistic results versus assuming performance on the “first” nine will be maintained for the “second” nine. With the latter approach, a good nine-hole score would result in an artificially low Score Differential and Handicap Index.

Prior to 2024, when nine holes were played, that score was either combined with an existing nine-hole score or waited for the next nine-hole score to be posted. The order of entry/sequence of nine-hole rounds was impactful on the result and sometimes produced noticeable variations for 18-hole Score Differentials.

In other situations, uncombined nine-hole scores waited for lengthy periods of time and the player’s Handicap Index may have changed significantly before being combined with another nine-hole score. The expected score procedure minimizes the volatility previously seen and allows for nine-hole rounds to count toward the Handicap Index calculation quickly. ▪

For more Handicap Hints, visit scga.org/whs-hub

Previous Article

Dropping Zones

Next Article

Practice-Shmactice

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Kevin O'Connor

Kevin joined the SCGA in August of 2012, and will oversee utilization of the USGA Handicap System by SCGA members and member clubs, including utilization of the GHIN service. Having worked at the Northern California Golf Association in a similar role, and then more recently in a senior management role with the United States Golf Association, his experience positions him to assist the SCGA and its members in continued successful implementation of these core programs.

Related articles More from author

  • In The ClubhouseProfilesWinter 2026

    Jim Murray

    January 30, 2026
    By Joe Passov
  • In The ClubhousePublic AffairsSummer 2025

    PLAYING TO OUR STRENGTHS

    August 20, 2025
    By SCGA Staff
  • Handicap HintsSummer 2021

    When Time Is of the Essence: What to Do When You Can’t Finish

    July 16, 2021
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • In The ClubhouseSummer 2024The Podium

    Golf Kept Me Going

    July 23, 2024
    By Richard Lowe
  • — FALL 2025In The ClubhouseKnow the Rules

    If You Play It, You Can Post It

    November 4, 2025
    By SCGA Staff
  • 19th HoleIn The ClubhouseSpring 2025

    Pelican Brief

    May 15, 2025
    By David Weiss

Recent Posts

  • FeaturedSpring 2026Sustainability

    The Grassmaster

  • FeaturedModern ClassicSpring 2026

    Renaissance at Pelican Hill

  • 19th HoleFeaturedSpring 2026

    Ember & Rye

  • FeaturedPublic AffairsSpring 2026

    Free(ing) The Tee

  • FeaturedProfilesSpring 2026

    DINAH

FeaturedPublic AffairsSpring 2026

Free(ing) The Tee

Let’s set the scene of the First Act in this three-act tale about tee time brokering. SCGA Public Affairs Director Kevin Fitzgerald found himself chairing a City of Los Angeles ...
  • Ember & Rye

    By David Weiss
    April 20, 2026
  • Home Away From Home

    By Tom Mackin
    April 20, 2026
  • Game of Throws

    By Robert Earle Howells
    April 20, 2026
  • A Pinch of Genius

    By Mike Reynolds
    April 20, 2026
© 2016 FORE Magazine About Us | Contact Us | Advertise