FORE Magazine

Top Menu

  • About Me
  • Contact Us
  • Home

Main Menu

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
  • scga.org
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login

logo

FORE Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Profiles
  • Sustainability
  • Travel
  • 19th Hole
  • Classic Course
  • FORE Her
  • More
    • Know the Rules
    • Handicap Hints
    • SCGA Junior
    • Where Are They Now?
    • News
    • Public Affairs
  • scga.org
Public AffairsWinter 2023
Home›Public Affairs›Grass by Design: Pure Research Yields New Strains of Drought-Tolerant Grass

Grass by Design: Pure Research Yields New Strains of Drought-Tolerant Grass

By Craig Kessler
February 7, 2023
827
0
Share:

What are UCR 17-8 and UCR TP6-3, and why are they worthy of being the lede in a story about research’s role in golf’s capacity to survive in an increasingly arid environment?

In short, these two nondescript letter/number combinations are emblematic of the kinds of innovations that have enabled the California golf community to dramatically reduce water consumption over the last 20 years — innovations born, in this instance, from the research conducted by Dr. James Baird and his UC Riverside Turf and Landscape Team — discoveries funded in large part by the golf community, including the SCGA, USGA, PGA and GCSAA.

More specifically, UCR-17-8 and UCR TP6-3 are strains of Bermudagrass that are drought-tolerant to the point of requiring 50 percent less water than most lawns in Southern California, soft enough to use for recreation, attractive enough for customers to want to buy and suitable for use on tees, fairways and rough.

And more to the point (at least from a golf perspective) they maintain green color during the winter, when most other Bermuda strains go semi-dormant. That’s the Holy Grail of desert golf, as it were, to the extent to which they can eliminate water consumptive overseeding practices. And these new cultivars meet California’s requirements for commercial use and sale.

They should be available for limited use and sale sometime in 2024. Of course, when they do hit the market, their current letter/number descriptors will be replaced by sexy, California-centric product names.

When they do hit the market with their sexy names, they’ll be but the latest addition in a long line of additions that golf facilities and their agronomic teams have employed for years in the pursuit of a reduced water footprint. So much attention is paid to the obvious benefits of turf reduction that we sometimes forget that using less water on remnant turf is another key tool in the game’s conservation toolbox.

And it’s an essential tool. Home, business and HOA common areas can rip out turf in favor of California-friendly, drought-tolerant landscapes that are as aesthetically pleasing as they are functional. Golf can only be played on turf, and while it can be played on less turf, we’re still talking about turf, which nature has assigned a certain biology-cum-evapotranspiration factor that cannot be altered by government diktat.

However, human ingenuity driven by research can produce strains of turf that are able to thrive and remain passably green with much less water, consistent with nature’s assignments. Strains already in wide use, such as the TifTuf variety developed by the University of Georgia, have more than demonstrated that.

From Trial to Market

Lest you think getting to this point was a quick and easy process, please know that getting from concept to reality was nearly a 10-year process that was punctuated in its last years by trials at several locations in both Southern and Northern California: The Farms GC, Rancho Santa Fe; Wilshire CC, Los Angeles; California State University, Titan Sports Complex, Fullerton; Cinnabar Hills GC, San Jose; and Yocha Dehe GC, Brooks.

UCR 17-8 was included as a local check in the USGA/ National Turfgrass Evaluation Program Warm-Season Water Use Trial, as well in as many other double-blind trials. The process for figuring out which of the 400-500 experimental trials
are worthy of moving from trial to proposal is onerous enough but the peer-review process of moving from proposal to market is even more so.

Lest you think that getting to a point like this is an inexpensive proposition, think again. It’s a pricey one that the University of California funds less and less with public sources with each passing year. The communities and stakeholders that benefit from research have to pony up more and more money to offset public purse cuts, lest their research get displaced by those stakeholders whose appetites for investment are greater.

California’s agricultural sector, which has long benefitted from state organized/sanctioned “commissions” that allow for the pooling of resources to fund the kinds of pure research that lead to greater crop yields and more efficient business practices, competes for limited UC bandwidth with golf and other sectors that don’t have the benefit of these government-sanctioned institutions.

And by the way, because it is tied to the land in the same way that agriculture is — something that few other business sectors can claim — golf is allowed under California law to establish a California Golf Commission that could allow for something as small as a 0.25 percent surcharge on greens fees to fund not just research, but also advocacy, education and marketing. But that’s a big subject for another story and another day.

Doing More with Less

Not too long ago, California had the benefit of two UC turf research programs: Baird’s UC Riverside program and another one at UC Davis. Baird’s program is the last one standing. This is in stark contrast to the turf research programs that proliferate at the many land grant colleges that dot the Northeast, Midwest and plains states. With those programs come many more practical education programs for the agronomists and golf course superintendents that a golf-saturated state like California constantly needs, no more so than now, when the game is enjoying more popularity than it has in a generation.

Other than some substantial grants from GCSAA, USGA and the occasional water district, the UCR Turf Research Program relies almost entirely on the California Turf & Landscape Foundation (CTLF) for funding. Straight from the website of the Foundation (catlf.org) is the following, which explains in the Foundation’s words what it does, why it does it and how it does it:

California Turfgrass & Landscape Foundation near Los Angeles, California, provides funding for practical research project development in the areas of turfgrass science and landscape management. Founded to support the cultivation and growth of resilient turf strains for golf, sports turf or landscape management, our backing is essential for recreational initiatives and local conservation efforts.

The SCGA has been a contributor for more than 20 years, as have many of the state’s golf clubs, GCSAA chapters and private-sector businesses. But those contributions are hardly enough, given the competition not just from the agricultural commissions but from other water-dependent sectors that, along with golf, have recognized that reductions in water consumption are central to long-term survival in a drying and warming state.

The central theme of last August’s big golf & water summit in Chino Hills was this: As much as the game takes great pride in what it has been able to accomplish in water conservation the last 20 years, it has no intention of resting on that record, but rather using it as a springboard to take what it learned in achieving that record to achieve considerably more in the next 20 years, not as a “do-good” proposition, but a survival proposition.

And one of the key lessons golf learned was the value of investing in pure research.

Previous Article

Best Ball Bar & Grill: Woodley Lakes ...

Next Article

New Year’s Daze: Looking Forward and Looking ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Craig Kessler

Craig came to the SCGA via the merger with the Public Links Golf Association (PLGA), where he served as Executive Director for 11 years and pioneered the development of the nation’s most active and accomplished advocacy component. He has been tasked with doing the same for the SCGA as its first Director of Governmental Affairs, albeit on a much larger stage. In addition to his current and previous job responsibilities, Craig has served as a USGA Committeemen continuously for 15 years, Chair of the Los Angeles Golf Advisory Commission, Chair of the Los Angeles County Golf Advisory Committee, Member of the City of Los Angeles’ Griffith Park Master Plan Board, Member of the Ventura Golf Advisory Group, Member of the Los Angeles County Junior Golf Foundation Board of Directors and Chair of the Los Angeles Junior Chamber of Commerce First Tee of Los Angeles Advisory Committee. In 2008 Craig was inducted into the Long Beach Golf Hall of Fame.

Related articles More from author

  • Public AffairsSpring 2022

    Golf’s Wakeup Call: Facts Matter… Perceptions Matter More

    April 20, 2022
    By Craig Kessler
  • Public AffairsSpring 2020

    Governmental Affairs: Whither Municipal Golf

    April 23, 2020
    By Craig Kessler
  • Fall 2017Public Affairs

    The Era of Recycled Water May Be Drawing to a Close

    October 23, 2017
    By Craig Kessler
  • ProfilesWinter 2023

    A Modern Throwback: Cole Young Calls his Own Shots

    February 7, 2023
    By Adam Hawk
  • Handicap HintsWinter 2023

    New Year’s Daze: Looking Forward and Looking Back at your Handicap

    February 7, 2023
    By Kevin O'Connor
  • Fall 2021Public AffairsSustainability

    Getting to the Root of the Problem: It’s the Land, Stupid!

    October 27, 2021
    By Craig Kessler

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • FeaturedSpring 2023State of the Game

    Big Is Beautiful: How Much More Distance Can We Expect in a Driver?

  • FeaturedFoundationSpring 2023

    Creating A Legacy: With A Bold Vision, LACC, The SCGA And The USGA Have Come Together To Invest In The Future Of The Game In Southern California

  • FeaturedProfilesSpring 2023

    Full Circle: Mike Kelly Takes The Reins

  • 19th HoleFeaturedSpring 2023

    French Toast with a Twist: Derricks Grille At Black Gold GC

  • FeaturedProfilesSpring 2023

    A Witness to History: Sportscaster Ted Sobel’s Firsthand Stories Of Greatness

FeaturedSpring 2023State of the Game

Big Is Beautiful: How Much More Distance Can We Expect in a Driver?

Four hundred: That’s how far I should be hitting my drives. Take my baseline 230-yarder from 15 or so years ago, add the gain promised annually with every best, better, ...
  • Word Play: “Playing Golf” VS “Golfing”

    By Tina Mickelson
    April 23, 2023
  • Club Spotlight: Los Compas GC

    By SCGA Staff
    April 23, 2023
  • Simple Twist of Fate: A Chance Encounter With An NFL Great Changed Michael Herrera’s Life

    By Tod Leonard
    April 23, 2023
  • Full Swing: Half Empty? A Contrarian View

    By David Weiss
    April 23, 2023
© 2016 FORE Magazine About Us | Contact Us | Advertise